| Title |
Interventions for preventing diarrhoea‐associated haemolytic uraemic syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012997.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aamer Imdad, Samuel P Mackoff, David M Urciuoli, Tamkeenat Syed, Emily E Tanner-Smith, Dongmei Huang, Oscar G Gomez-Duarte |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Peru | 1 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 40 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 46 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,360,734
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,839
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,159
of 453,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.