| Title |
Bisphosphonate use in children with cerebral palsy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012756.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim Hurley, Zunera Zareen, Philip Stewart, Ciara McDonnell, Denise McDonald, Eleanor Molloy |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 87% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 146 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Researcher | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 86 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 92 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,416,375
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,056
of 12,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,973
of 439,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.