↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Protons versus photons for the treatment of chordoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Protons versus photons for the treatment of chordoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013224.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iman El Sayed, Daniel M Trifiletti, Eric J Lehrer, Timothy N Showalter, Sunil W Dutta

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 11 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 31%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,960,442
of 21,084,186 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,948
of 12,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,643
of 339,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,084,186 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.