↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes following surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes following surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004082.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael PW Grocott, Ahilanandan Dushianthan, Mark A Hamilton, Michael G Mythen, David Harrison, Kathy Rowan

Abstract

Studies have suggested that increasing whole body blood flow and oxygen delivery around the time of surgery reduces mortality, morbidity and the expense of major operations.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 265 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 19%
Researcher 34 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 11%
Other 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Other 63 23%
Unknown 47 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 143 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 8%
Psychology 8 3%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 61 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2015.
All research outputs
#731,581
of 13,072,640 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,397
of 10,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,254
of 251,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#136
of 513 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,072,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 513 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.