| Title |
Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes following surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004082.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael PW Grocott, Ahilanandan Dushianthan, Mark A Hamilton, Michael G Mythen, David Harrison, Kathy Rowan |
| Abstract |
Studies have suggested that increasing whole body blood flow and oxygen delivery around the time of surgery reduces mortality, morbidity and the expense of major operations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 71% |
| United States | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 373 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 15% |
| Researcher | 39 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 9% |
| Other | 31 | 8% |
| Other | 73 | 19% |
| Unknown | 108 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 165 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Psychology | 10 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 8% |
| Unknown | 123 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,355,885
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,116
of 12,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,774
of 178,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.