| Title |
Sound therapy (masking) in the management of tinnitus in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006371.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Hobson, Edward Chisholm, Amr El Refaie |
| Abstract |
This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 12, 2010.Tinnitus is described as the perception of sound or noise in the absence of real acoustic stimulation. Numerous management strategies have been tried for this potentially debilitating, heterogeneous symptom. External noise has been used as a management tool for tinnitus, in different capacities and with different philosophical intent, for over a century. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Guernsey | 1 | 14% |
| Japan | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 296 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 65 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 9% |
| Researcher | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 50 | 17% |
| Unknown | 84 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 101 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 10% |
| Psychology | 20 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 36 | 12% |
| Unknown | 95 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,211,515
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,544
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,143
of 192,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.