| Title |
Mini-Cog for the detection of dementia within a primary care setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011415.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dallas P Seitz, Calvin CH Chan, Hailey T Newton, Sudeep S Gill, Nathan Herrmann, Nadja Smailagic, Vasilis Nikolaou, Bruce A Fage |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Professor | 2 | 3% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 45 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 48 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,103,569
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,538
of 12,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,318
of 435,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#69
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.