↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Replacement arthroplasty versus internal fixation for extracapsular hip fractures in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Replacement arthroplasty versus internal fixation for extracapsular hip fractures in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000086.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martyn J Parker, Helen HG Handoll

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 125 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 19%
Student > Bachelor 21 17%
Other 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 26 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Psychology 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 31 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2021.
All research outputs
#14,966,952
of 18,687,462 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,918
of 11,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,791
of 253,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,687,462 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.