The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Light therapy for non‐seasonal depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004050.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arja Tuunainen, Daniel F Kripke, Takuro Endo |
| Abstract |
Efficacy of light therapy for non-seasonal depression has been studied without any consensus on its efficacy. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Japan | 1 | 11% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 283 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 13% |
| Researcher | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 18% |
| Unknown | 83 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 24% |
| Psychology | 45 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 44 | 15% |
| Unknown | 92 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#545,556
of 26,391,552 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#901
of 13,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#531
of 63,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,391,552 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.