↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Light therapy for non-seasonal depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
236 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Light therapy for non-seasonal depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004050.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arja Tuunainen, Daniel F Kripke, Takuro Endo

Abstract

Efficacy of light therapy for non-seasonal depression has been studied without any consensus on its efficacy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 262 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 14%
Researcher 36 13%
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 50 18%
Unknown 70 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 25%
Psychology 44 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 6%
Neuroscience 12 4%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 78 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#737,384
of 23,330,477 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,513
of 12,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#774
of 59,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,330,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.