↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Light therapy for non-seasonal depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
219 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Light therapy for non-seasonal depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004050.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arja Tuunainen, Daniel F Kripke, Takuro Endo

Abstract

Efficacy of light therapy for non-seasonal depression has been studied without any consensus on its efficacy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 234 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 14%
Researcher 35 14%
Student > Bachelor 30 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 49 20%
Unknown 51 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 28%
Psychology 43 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 6%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Neuroscience 9 4%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 58 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2020.
All research outputs
#516,166
of 17,991,759 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,179
of 11,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,391
of 264,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,991,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.