| Title |
Telehealth interventions: remote monitoring and consultations for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013196.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sadia Janjua, Deborah Carter, Christopher Jd Threapleton, Samantha Prigmore, Rebecca T Disler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 287 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Researcher | 24 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 41 | 14% |
| Unknown | 149 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 4% |
| Engineering | 8 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Unknown | 157 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,305,122
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,079
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,283
of 446,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#93
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.