↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Enhanced external counterpulsation for chronic angina pectoris

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
Enhanced external counterpulsation for chronic angina pectoris
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007219.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fawzi Amin, Amani Al Hajeri, Birol Civelek, Zbys Fedorowicz, Bruce M Manzer

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of death in developed and developing countries. Refractory stable angina pectoris is, in general, inadequately responsive to conventional medical therapy.Enhanced external counterpulsation is a non-invasive treatment for patients with refractory angina and involves the placing of compressible cuffs around the calves and lower and upper thighs. These are inflated sequentially so that during early diastole they help propel blood back to the heart and when deflated at end of diastole allow the blood vessels to return to their normal state. It is claimed that enhanced external counterpulsation can help reduce aortic impedance and thereby alleviate some of the symptoms of angina.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 130 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 35 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Psychology 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 39 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,575,385
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,960
of 12,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,795
of 94,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.