↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Patient navigator programmes for children and adolescents with chronic diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Patient navigator programmes for children and adolescents with chronic diseases
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd014688
Authors

Rowena Lalji, Anna Francis, Rabia Khalid, Chandana Guha, David W Johnson, Germaine Wong

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,445,848
of 19,198,440 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,080
of 11,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,091
of 334,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,198,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.