| Title |
Patient navigator programmes for children and adolescents with chronic diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd014688 |
| Authors |
Rowena Lalji, Anna Francis, Rabia Khalid, Chandana Guha, David W Johnson, Germaine Wong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,858,306
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,048
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,254
of 442,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#95
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.