↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for tophi in gout

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for tophi in gout
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010069.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melonie K Sriranganathan, Ophir Vinik, Jordi Pardo Pardo, Claire Bombardier, Christopher J Edwards

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 75%
Unknown 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,087,329
of 19,163,209 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,691
of 11,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,386
of 331,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,163,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.