| Title |
Enteral tube feeding for people with severe dementia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013503.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nathan Davies, Yolanda Barrado-Martín, Victoria Vickerstaff, Greta Rait, Akiko Fukui, Bridget Candy, Christina H Smith, Jill Manthorpe, Kirsten J Moore, Elizabeth L Sampson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 465 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 118 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 88 | 19% |
| Mexico | 13 | 3% |
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| Chile | 7 | 2% |
| Peru | 4 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Ireland | 4 | <1% |
| Argentina | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 30 | 6% |
| Unknown | 187 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 358 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 73 | 16% |
| Scientists | 31 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 258 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 9% |
| Researcher | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 13% |
| Unknown | 146 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 10% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Unknown | 150 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 342. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2024.
All research outputs
#97,888
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#186
of 13,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,936
of 438,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.