↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for great saphenous vein incompetence

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
22 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for great saphenous vein incompetence
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005624.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jade Whing, Sandip Nandhra, Craig Nesbitt, Gerard Stansby

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 127 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 8 6%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 55 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 56 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,108,873
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,286
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,694
of 437,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.