↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for great saphenous vein incompetence

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
23 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for great saphenous vein incompetence
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005624.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jade Whing, Sandip Nandhra, Craig Nesbitt, Gerard Stansby

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 33 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Unspecified 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 36 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2022.
All research outputs
#948,788
of 23,367,368 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,083
of 12,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,807
of 431,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,367,368 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.