↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chemotherapy for metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
Title
Chemotherapy for metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006469.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate Scatchard, Jennifer L Forrest, Maxine Flubacher, Paul Cornes, Chris Williams

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer among women up to 65 years of age and is the most frequent cause of death from gynaecological cancers worldwide. A woman's risk of developing cervical cancer by 65 years of age ranges from 0.69% in developed countries to 1.38% in developing countries. Although screening by Pap smear should mean early detection at a curable stage for most women, many still present with advanced or metastatic disease with a worse prognosis. The addition of platinum-based chemotherapy to radiotherapy has improved outcome compared to radiotherapy alone; however, 30% to 50% fail to respond to treatment or develop recurrent disease. There are no standard treatment options for these patients, although platinum-based chemotherapy is frequently used and trials are on-going.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 203 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 14%
Researcher 26 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 41 20%
Unknown 58 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 63 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2017.
All research outputs
#14,740,534
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,613
of 12,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,091
of 175,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#192
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.