| Title |
Psychological therapies for the treatment of post‐traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006726.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Donna Gillies, Fiona Taylor, Carl Gray, Louise O'Brien, Natalie D'Abrew |
| Abstract |
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is highly prevalent in children and adolescents who have experienced trauma and has high personal and health costs. Although a wide range of psychological therapies have been used in the treatment of PTSD there are no systematic reviews of these therapies in children and adolescents. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 32% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 24% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 436 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 426 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 97 | 22% |
| Researcher | 50 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 7% |
| Other | 63 | 14% |
| Unknown | 113 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 118 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 36 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 8% |
| Unknown | 127 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2022.
All research outputs
#834,817
of 25,653,515 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,592
of 13,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,099
of 287,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,653,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.