↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nutritional supplementation for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
453 Mendeley
Title
Nutritional supplementation for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000998.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivone M Ferreira, Dina Brooks, John White, Roger Goldstein

Abstract

Individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and low body weight have impaired pulmonary status, reduced diaphragmatic mass, lower exercise capacity and higher mortality than those who are adequately nourished. Nutritional support may be useful for their comprehensive care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 453 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 445 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 98 22%
Student > Bachelor 57 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 9%
Researcher 33 7%
Other 29 6%
Other 94 21%
Unknown 103 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 166 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 69 15%
Social Sciences 18 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Psychology 10 2%
Other 52 11%
Unknown 124 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,952,680
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,282
of 12,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,020
of 280,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.