↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Push versus gravity for intermittent bolus gavage tube feeding of preterm and low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
Push versus gravity for intermittent bolus gavage tube feeding of preterm and low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005249.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer A Dawson, Ravinder Summan, Nadia Badawi, Jann P Foster

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Unknown 98 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 56 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 60 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,135,750
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,879
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,395
of 438,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#87
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.