↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Push versus gravity for intermittent bolus gavage tube feeding of preterm and low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Push versus gravity for intermittent bolus gavage tube feeding of preterm and low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005249.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer A Dawson, Ravinder Summan, Nadia Badawi, Jann P Foster

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
India 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Other 3 11%
Lecturer 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Psychology 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,269,200
of 19,680,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,922
of 11,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,014
of 335,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,680,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.