The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Antibiotics for treating community acquired pneumonia in people with sickle cell disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005598.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Martí-Carvajal, Arturo J, Conterno, Lucieni O |
Abstract |
As a consequence of their condition, people with sickle cell disease are at high risk of developing an acute infection of the pulmonary parenchyma called community-acquired pneumonia. Many different bacteria can cause this infection and antibiotic treatment is generally needed to resolve it. There is no standardized approach to antibiotic therapy and treatment is likely to vary from country to country. Thus, there is a need to identify the efficacy and safety of different antibiotic treatment approaches for people with sickle cell disease suffering from community-acquired pneumonia. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Egypt | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 38 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 21% |
Researcher | 6 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
Other | 8 | 19% |
Unknown | 5 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 62% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2012.
All research outputs
#14,158,070
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,379
of 12,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,602
of 175,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#187
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.