| Title |
SARS‐CoV‐2‐neutralising monoclonal antibodies for treatment of COVID‐19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013825.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nina Kreuzberger, Caroline Hirsch, Khai Li Chai, Eve Tomlinson, Zahra Khosravi, Maria Popp, Miriam Neidhardt, Vanessa Piechotta, Susanne Salomon, Sarah J Valk, Ina Monsef, Christoph Schmaderer, Erica M Wood, Cynthia So-Osman, David J Roberts, Zoe McQuilten, Lise J Estcourt, Nicole Skoetz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 272 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 50 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Japan | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 188 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 255 | 94% |
| Scientists | 10 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 271 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 11% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Researcher | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 15% |
| Unknown | 125 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 14% |
| Unknown | 131 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 222. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#176,170
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#304
of 13,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,845
of 435,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.