↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Techniques to ascertain correct endotracheal tube placement in neonates

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Techniques to ascertain correct endotracheal tube placement in neonates
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010221.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georg M Schmölzer, Charles Christoph C Roehr

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 13%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Other 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 22 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 27 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#6,372,280
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,195
of 12,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,379
of 328,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#148
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.