| Title |
Oral versus intravenous rehydration for treating dehydration due to gastroenteritis in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004390.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa Hartling, Steven Bellemare, Natasha Wiebe, Kelly F Russell, Terry P Klassen, William Raine Craig |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Spain | 2 | 9% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 14% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 21% |
| Unknown | 40 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 48 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,213,225
of 25,547,324 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,554
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,999
of 90,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,547,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.