↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-pharmacological measures implemented in the setting of long-term care facilities to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections and their consequences: a rapid review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
103 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
Non-pharmacological measures implemented in the setting of long-term care facilities to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections and their consequences: a rapid review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd015085.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan M Stratil, Renke L Biallas, Jacob Burns, Laura Arnold, Karin Geffert, Angela M Kunzler, Ina Monsef, Julia Stadelmaier, Katharina Wabnitz, Tim Litwin, Clemens Kreutz, Anna Helen Boger, Saskia Lindner, Ben Verboom, Stephan Voss, Ani Movsisyan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 154 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 12%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Unspecified 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 63 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Unspecified 14 9%
Psychology 8 5%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 73 47%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2022.
All research outputs
#395,590
of 21,714,585 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#741
of 12,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,837
of 342,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,714,585 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.