↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-pharmacological measures implemented in the setting of long-term care facilities to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections and their consequences: a rapid review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
101 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Non-pharmacological measures implemented in the setting of long-term care facilities to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections and their consequences: a rapid review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd015085.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan M Stratil, Renke L Biallas, Jacob Burns, Laura Arnold, Karin Geffert, Angela M Kunzler, Ina Monsef, Julia Stadelmaier, Katharina Wabnitz, Tim Litwin, Clemens Kreutz, Anna Helen Boger, Saskia Lindner, Ben Verboom, Stephan Voss, Ani Movsisyan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Librarian 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 37 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Psychology 4 5%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 42 55%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2021.
All research outputs
#373,030
of 19,814,211 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#742
of 11,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,510
of 338,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,814,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.