↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐pharmacological measures implemented in the setting of long‐term care facilities to prevent SARS‐CoV‐2 infections and their consequences: a rapid review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
90 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
Title
Non‐pharmacological measures implemented in the setting of long‐term care facilities to prevent SARS‐CoV‐2 infections and their consequences: a rapid review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd015085.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan M Stratil, Renke L Biallas, Jacob Burns, Laura Arnold, Karin Geffert, Angela M Kunzler, Ina Monsef, Julia Stadelmaier, Katharina Wabnitz, Tim Litwin, Clemens Kreutz, Anna Helen Boger, Saskia Lindner, Ben Verboom, Stephan Voss, Ani Movsisyan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 243 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 11%
Researcher 23 9%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 5%
Other 13 5%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 123 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 9%
Psychology 10 4%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Unspecified 5 2%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 138 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#555,487
of 26,375,498 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#920
of 13,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,277
of 439,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.