| Title |
Accuracy of routine laboratory tests to predict mortality and deterioration to severe or critical COVID‐19 in people with SARS‐CoV‐2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd015050 |
| Authors |
Jan Y Verbakel, Liselore De Rop, Inge Stegeman, Gea A. Holtman, Eleanor A Ochodo, Bada Yang, Fatuma Guleid, Clare Davenport, Jonathan J Deeks, Jacqueline Dinnes, Sabine Dittrich, Devy Emperador, Lotty Hooft, René Spijker, Ann Van den Bruel, Junfeng Wang, Yemisi Takwoingi, Miranda W Langendam, Mariska MG Leeflang, Cochrane COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Librarian | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2021.
All research outputs
#16,044,798
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,526
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,456
of 436,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#122
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.