↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Accuracy of routine laboratory tests to predict mortality and deterioration to severe or critical COVID-19 in people with SARS-CoV-2

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Accuracy of routine laboratory tests to predict mortality and deterioration to severe or critical COVID-19 in people with SARS-CoV-2
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd015050
Authors

Jan Y Verbakel, Liselore De Rop, Inge Stegeman, Gea A. Holtman, Eleanor A Ochodo, Bada Yang, Fatuma Guleid, Clare Davenport, Jonathan J Deeks, Jacqueline Dinnes, Sabine Dittrich, Devy Emperador, Lotty Hooft, René Spijker, Ann Van den Bruel, Junfeng Wang, Yemisi Takwoingi, Miranda W Langendam, Mariska MG Leeflang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Professor 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2021.
All research outputs
#13,788,113
of 22,192,088 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,256
of 12,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,106
of 350,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,192,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.