↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs for prevention of restenosis/reocclusion following peripheral endovascular treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs for prevention of restenosis/reocclusion following peripheral endovascular treatment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002071.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lindsay Robertson, Maaz A Ghouri, Flora Kovacs

Abstract

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is frequently treated by balloon angioplasty. Restenosis/reocclusion of the dilated segments occurs often, depending on length of occlusion, lower leg outflow, stage of disease and presence of cardiovascular risk factors. To prevent reocclusion, patients are treated with antithrombotic agents. This is an update of a review first published in 2005.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 159 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 23%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 44 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Psychology 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 50 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2020.
All research outputs
#15,260,208
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,771
of 12,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,668
of 167,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#171
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.