The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Oral anticoagulation in people with cancer who have no therapeutic or prophylactic indication for anticoagulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006466.pub7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lara A Kahale, Charbel F Matar, Ibrahim Tsolakian, Maram B Hakoum, Maddalena Barba, Victor Ed Yosuico, Irene Terrenato, Francesca Sperati, Holger Schünemann, Elie A Akl |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lebanon | 1 | 13% |
| Italy | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 58 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 61 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,170,704
of 26,617,918 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,710
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,992
of 444,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,617,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.