↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Anticoagulation for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Anticoagulation for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002005.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Coutinho, Sebastiaan FTM de Bruijn, Gabrielle deVeber, Jan Stam

Abstract

Treatment of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis with anticoagulants has been controversial. Anticoagulants may prevent new venous infarcts, neurologic deterioration and pulmonary embolism but may also promote haemorrhages.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 140 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 22 15%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 11%
Other 14 10%
Other 37 26%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 61%
Neuroscience 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 26 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,114,552
of 12,630,443 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,553
of 10,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,987
of 255,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#213
of 518 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,630,443 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 518 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.