↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chloral hydrate as a sedating agent for neurodiagnostic procedures in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Chloral hydrate as a sedating agent for neurodiagnostic procedures in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011786.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Choong Yi Fong, Wei Kang Lim, Limin Li, Nai Ming Lai

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 18%
Other 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Unspecified 5 6%
Researcher 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 30 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 27%
Unspecified 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 34 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#17,639,319
of 22,641,687 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,260
of 12,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,311
of 397,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#147
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,641,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.