| Title |
Antibiotics for the treatment of COVID‐19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd015025 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Popp, Miriam Stegemann, Manuel Riemer, Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Carolina S Romero, Agata Mikolajewska, Peter Kranke, Patrick Meybohm, Nicole Skoetz, Stephanie Weibel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 147 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 7% |
| France | 10 | 7% |
| Brazil | 7 | 5% |
| Greece | 5 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 2% |
| Belgium | 3 | 2% |
| Cyprus | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 77 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 119 | 81% |
| Scientists | 16 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 216 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 8% |
| Researcher | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 106 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Unknown | 113 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 156. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#270,672
of 25,907,102 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#437
of 13,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,033
of 445,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,907,102 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.