↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Occupational therapy for patients with Parkinson's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
330 Mendeley
Title
Occupational therapy for patients with Parkinson's disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002813.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynn Dixon, Dawn C Duncan, Paul Johnson, Liz Kirkby, Helen O'Connell, Hilary J Taylor, Katherine Deane

Abstract

Despite drug and surgical therapies for Parkinson's disease, patients develop progressive disability. It has both motor and non-motor symptomatology, and their interaction with their environment can be very complex. The role of the occupational therapist is to support the patient and help them maintain their usual level of self-care, work and leisure activities for as long as possible. When it is no longer possible to maintain their usual activities, occupational therapists support individuals in changing and adapting their relationship with their physical and social environment to develop new valued activities and roles.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 327 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 15%
Student > Bachelor 46 14%
Researcher 35 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 11%
Other 16 5%
Other 77 23%
Unknown 73 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 15%
Psychology 20 6%
Neuroscience 16 5%
Unspecified 14 4%
Other 62 19%
Unknown 83 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#6,252,911
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,077
of 12,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,461
of 67,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.