↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Preconception risk assessment for thalassaemia, sickle cell disease, cystic fibrosis and Tay‐Sachs disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
Preconception risk assessment for thalassaemia, sickle cell disease, cystic fibrosis and Tay‐Sachs disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010849.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Norita Hussein, Lidewij Henneman, Joe Kai, Nadeem Qureshi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 17 10%
Student > Master 15 9%
Other 9 5%
Student > Bachelor 9 5%
Researcher 9 5%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 86 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 17%
Unspecified 17 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 91 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,936,408
of 26,338,415 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,794
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,341
of 443,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#129
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,338,415 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.