↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ultrasound‐guided transvaginal ovarian needle drilling for clomiphene‐resistant polycystic ovarian syndrome in subfertile women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Ultrasound‐guided transvaginal ovarian needle drilling for clomiphene‐resistant polycystic ovarian syndrome in subfertile women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008583.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Zhang, Liulin Tang, Linglingli Kong, Taixiang Wu, Liangzhi Xu, Xin Pan, Guan J Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 7 9%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 4 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 41 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 44 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,118,947
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,558
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,502
of 444,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.