| Title |
Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013385.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janet Jull, Sascha Köpke, Maureen Smith, Meg Carley, Jeanette Finderup, Anne C Rahn, Laura Boland, Sandra Dunn, Andrew A Dwyer, Jürgen Kasper, Simone Maria Kienlin, France Légaré, Krystina B Lewis, Anne Lyddiatt, Claudia Rutherford, Junqiang Zhao, Tamara Rader, Ian D Graham, Dawn Stacey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 15% |
| Canada | 8 | 12% |
| Germany | 4 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 27 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 75% |
| Scientists | 9 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 280 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 7% |
| Researcher | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 49 | 18% |
| Unknown | 149 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 4% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 157 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#329,390
of 25,901,238 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#539
of 13,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,379
of 446,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,901,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.