↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Infusion techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000985.pub3
Authors

Cathryn Broderick, Jai V Patel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 26%
Researcher 6 12%
Other 4 8%
Unspecified 4 8%
Librarian 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 13 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Unspecified 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 15 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,428,992
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,936
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,983
of 499,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#138
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 499,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.