↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Enteral tube feeding for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Enteral tube feeding for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004030.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hans Dieter Katzberg, Michael Benatar

Abstract

Enteral feeding (tube feeding) is offered to many people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease experiencing difficulty swallowing (dysphagia) and maintaining adequate nutritional intake leading to weight loss.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 133 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 21%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 22 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 17%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 29 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,703,334
of 16,038,450 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,246
of 11,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,304
of 263,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#206
of 472 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,038,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 472 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.