↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Enteral tube feeding for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Enteral tube feeding for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004030.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hans Dieter Katzberg, Michael Benatar

Abstract

Enteral feeding (tube feeding) is offered to many people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease experiencing difficulty swallowing (dysphagia) and maintaining adequate nutritional intake leading to weight loss.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 153 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 19%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 34 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 16%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 40 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,531,920
of 22,620,502 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,137
of 12,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,951
of 178,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,620,502 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.