| Title |
Interventions for intermittent exotropia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003737.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yi Pang, Lawrence Gnanaraj, Jessica Gayleard, Genie Han, Sarah R Hatt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 50 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 55 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,328,780
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,862
of 12,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,329
of 428,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#123
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.