↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for intermittent exotropia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for intermittent exotropia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003737.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Pang, Lawrence Gnanaraj, Jessica Gayleard, Genie Han, Sarah R Hatt

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 23%
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 19 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 21 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,945,680
of 22,040,807 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,633
of 12,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,421
of 497,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,040,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 497,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.