| Title |
Psychological and pharmacological interventions for depression in patients with diabetes mellitus and depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008381.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harald Baumeister, Nico Hutter, Jürgen Bengel |
| Abstract |
Depression occurs frequently in patients with diabetes mellitus and is associated with a poor prognosis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Denmark | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 460 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 450 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 62 | 13% |
| Researcher | 56 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 8% |
| Other | 82 | 18% |
| Unknown | 123 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 130 | 28% |
| Psychology | 54 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 54 | 12% |
| Unknown | 146 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,150,097
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,268
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,228
of 286,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#114
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.