| Title |
Psychological and pharmacological interventions for depression in patients with diabetes mellitus and depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008381.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harald Baumeister, Nico Hutter, Jürgen Bengel |
| Abstract |
Depression occurs frequently in patients with diabetes mellitus and is associated with a poor prognosis. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Denmark | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 450 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 440 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 13% |
| Researcher | 56 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 33 | 7% |
| Other | 81 | 18% |
| Unknown | 119 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 128 | 28% |
| Psychology | 54 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 52 | 12% |
| Unknown | 142 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#6,175,297
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,018
of 12,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,311
of 278,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.