The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Therapeutic ultrasound for postpartum perineal pain and dyspareunia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000495 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean Hay‐Smith |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 162 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 56 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 18% |
| Psychology | 9 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 65 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2016.
All research outputs
#8,572,103
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,245
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,889
of 31,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.