↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vitamin E for intermittent claudication

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin E for intermittent claudication
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 1998
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000987
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jos Kleijnen, Dorothy Mackerras

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Researcher 7 10%
Other 7 10%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 16 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2007.
All research outputs
#6,374,815
of 19,645,988 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,464
of 11,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,414
of 265,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,645,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.