↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Copper containing intra‐uterine devices versus depot progestogens for contraception

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Copper containing intra‐uterine devices versus depot progestogens for contraception
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007043.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

G Justus Hofmeyr, Mandisa Singata, Theresa A Lawrie

Abstract

Highly effective contraception is essential to reduce unintended pregnancies and the effect these have on individuals, society and public health resources. Intrauterine devices (IUDs) and depot progestogens are two commonly used long-acting, reversible contraceptive methods with different risk and benefit profiles.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 151 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 20%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 5%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 45 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 13%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 48 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,723,696
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,914
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,471
of 96,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.