Title |
Copper containing intra‐uterine devices versus depot progestogens for contraception
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007043.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
G Justus Hofmeyr, Mandisa Singata, Theresa A Lawrie |
Abstract |
Highly effective contraception is essential to reduce unintended pregnancies and the effect these have on individuals, society and public health resources. Intrauterine devices (IUDs) and depot progestogens are two commonly used long-acting, reversible contraceptive methods with different risk and benefit profiles. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 151 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 30 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
Researcher | 16 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 5% |
Other | 26 | 17% |
Unknown | 45 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Psychology | 5 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 8% |
Unknown | 48 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,723,696
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,914
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,471
of 96,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.