| Title |
Clinical assessment for the detection of oral cavity cancer and potentially malignant disorders in apparently healthy adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010173.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tanya Walsh, Saman Warnakulasuriya, Mark W Lingen, Alexander R Kerr, Graham R Ogden, Anne-Marie Glenny, Richard Macey |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Mexico | 2 | 13% |
| Peru | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 28 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 18% |
| Unknown | 43 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 32% |
| Unspecified | 34 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Psychology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 47 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,492,078
of 23,924,386 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,392
of 12,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,012
of 517,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,924,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.