| Title |
Humidification of indoor air for preventing or reducing dryness symptoms or upper respiratory infections in educational settings and at the workplace
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012219.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katarzyna Byber, Thomas Radtke, Dan Norbäck, Christine Hitzke, David Imo, Matthias Schwenkglenks, Milo A Puhan, Holger Dressel, Margot Mutsch |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 29% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 39 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Researcher | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 4% |
| Professor | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 47 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 41 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 51 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#6,818,056
of 24,262,436 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,592
of 12,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,017
of 509,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#130
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,262,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.