↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Humidification of indoor air for preventing or reducing dryness symptoms or upper respiratory infections in educational settings and at the workplace

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Humidification of indoor air for preventing or reducing dryness symptoms or upper respiratory infections in educational settings and at the workplace
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012219.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katarzyna Byber, Thomas Radtke, Dan Norbäck, Christine Hitzke, David Imo, Matthias Schwenkglenks, Milo A Puhan, Holger Dressel, Margot Mutsch

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 15 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 16 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#12,408,675
of 21,429,365 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,718
of 12,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,047
of 468,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,429,365 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 468,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.