↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
Title
Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008212.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mathew Leonardi, Mike Armour, Tatjana Gibbons, Adele E Cave, Sawsan As-Sanie, George Condous, Ying C Cheong

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 158 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Other 10 6%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 51 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 27%
Unspecified 18 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 58 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,187,399
of 22,487,039 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,705
of 12,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,125
of 508,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,487,039 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.