↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
37 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
Title
Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002042.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey L Carson, Simon J Stanworth, Jane A Dennis, Marialena Trivella, Nareg Roubinian, Dean A Fergusson, Darrell Triulzi, Carolyn Dorée, Paul C Hébert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 281 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 9%
Student > Bachelor 26 9%
Other 19 7%
Researcher 18 6%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Other 48 17%
Unknown 127 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Psychology 6 2%
Unspecified 4 1%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 140 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
#906,816
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,769
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,474
of 515,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.