↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
37 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002042.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey L Carson, Simon J Stanworth, Jane A Dennis, Marialena Trivella, Nareg Roubinian, Dean A Fergusson, Darrell Triulzi, Carolyn Dorée, Paul C Hébert

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Unspecified 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 17 25%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 33%
Unspecified 7 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 18 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2022.
All research outputs
#751,092
of 21,173,427 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,691
of 12,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,217
of 448,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,173,427 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.