↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
219 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
329 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003407.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomy Tonia, Annette Mettler, Nadège Robert, Guido Schwarzer, Jerome Seidenfeld, Olaf Weingart, Chris Hyde, Andreas Engert, Julia Bohlius

Abstract

Anaemia associated with cancer and cancer therapy is an important clinical factor in the treatment of malignant diseases. Therapeutic alternatives are recombinant human erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) and red blood cell transfusions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 323 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 15%
Researcher 37 11%
Student > Bachelor 33 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 10%
Other 29 9%
Other 65 20%
Unknown 83 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 150 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Psychology 8 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 93 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,083,513
of 19,830,977 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,673
of 11,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,303
of 266,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#213
of 498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,830,977 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.