↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Distraction techniques for schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Distraction techniques for schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004717.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlotte J Crawford-Walker, Adrian King, Sally Chan

Abstract

Distraction techniques are a form of coping strategies used in cognitive behavioural techniques. They may be of value as an adjunctive treatment for people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like illnesses.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 124 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Student > Master 19 15%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 32 25%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 25%
Psychology 29 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 25 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2017.
All research outputs
#3,735,595
of 18,771,444 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,357
of 11,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,937
of 265,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#301
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,771,444 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.