| Title |
Distraction techniques for schizophrenia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004717.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlotte J Crawford‐Walker, Adrian King, Sally Chan |
| Abstract |
Distraction techniques are a form of coping strategies used in cognitive behavioural techniques. They may be of value as an adjunctive treatment for people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like illnesses. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 158 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 22% |
| Unknown | 46 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 22% |
| Psychology | 30 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 51 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2017.
All research outputs
#6,556,797
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,847
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,189
of 158,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.