↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental implants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
327 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental implants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003069.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Gabriella Grusovin, Paul Coulthard, Helen V Worthington, Peter George, Marco Esposito

Abstract

It is important to institute an effective supportive therapy to maintain or recover soft tissue health around dental implants. Different maintenance regimens have been suggested, however it is unclear which are the most effective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 321 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 9%
Researcher 26 8%
Student > Postgraduate 26 8%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Other 48 15%
Unknown 106 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 165 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 4%
Psychology 8 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Other 18 6%
Unknown 115 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,272,876
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,695
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,204
of 104,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.