| Title |
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental implants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003069.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Gabriella Grusovin, Paul Coulthard, Helen V Worthington, Peter George, Marco Esposito |
| Abstract |
It is important to institute an effective supportive therapy to maintain or recover soft tissue health around dental implants. Different maintenance regimens have been suggested, however it is unclear which are the most effective. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 302 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 62 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 8% |
| Researcher | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 47 | 15% |
| Unknown | 92 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 163 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 4% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Unknown | 101 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,009,254
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,426
of 12,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,221
of 96,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.