| Title |
Acupuncture for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in neonates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007968.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Virginia Wong, Daniel KL Cheuk, Vanessa Chu |
| Abstract |
Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) in the neonate is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Effective treatment options are limited and therefore alternative therapies such as acupuncture are increasingly used. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 166 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 56 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 61 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#5,511,908
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,368
of 12,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,955
of 282,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.