↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Acupuncture for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in neonates

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Acupuncture for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in neonates
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007968.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virginia Wong, Daniel KL Cheuk, Vanessa Chu

Abstract

Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) in the neonate is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Effective treatment options are limited and therefore alternative therapies such as acupuncture are increasingly used.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 122 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 31 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 34 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,585,556
of 18,011,329 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,215
of 11,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,679
of 256,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#286
of 470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,011,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.