↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Acupuncture for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in neonates

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
Acupuncture for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in neonates
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007968.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virginia Wong, Daniel KL Cheuk, Vanessa Chu

Abstract

Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) in the neonate is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Effective treatment options are limited and therefore alternative therapies such as acupuncture are increasingly used.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 168 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Researcher 16 9%
Other 8 5%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 59 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 64 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,825,682
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,411
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,022
of 291,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.