↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Enteral feeding methods for nutritional management in patients with head and neck cancers being treated with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Enteral feeding methods for nutritional management in patients with head and neck cancers being treated with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007904.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brenda Nugent, Sian Lewis, Joe M O'Sullivan

Abstract

This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 3, 2010.For many patients with head and neck cancer, oral nutrition will not provide adequate nourishment during treatment with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy due to the acute toxicity of treatment, obstruction caused by the tumour, or both. The optimal method of enteral feeding for this patient group has yet to be established.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 259 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 21%
Researcher 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Other 22 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Other 58 22%
Unknown 48 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 13%
Psychology 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 68 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,118,644
of 20,747,699 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,650
of 12,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,200
of 274,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#282
of 457 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,747,699 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 457 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.