↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oxygen therapy during exercise training in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
Title
Oxygen therapy during exercise training in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005372.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mika Nonoyama, Dina Brooks, Yves Lacasse, Gordon H Guyatt, Roger Goldstein

Abstract

Exercise training within the context of pulmonary rehabilitation improves outcomes of exercise capacity, dyspnea and health-related quality of life in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Supplemental oxygen in comparison to placebo increases exercise capacity in patients performing single-assessment exercise tests. The addition of supplemental oxygen during exercise training may enable individuals with COPD to tolerate higher levels of activity with less exertional symptoms, ultimately improving quality of life.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 220 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 20%
Researcher 31 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 47 21%
Unknown 39 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 14%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Psychology 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 45 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2016.
All research outputs
#10,023,987
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,201
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,172
of 250,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#386
of 433 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 433 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.